Thursday, October 06, 2005
Quote:Breast feeding babies may have a nostalgic background, particularly to a Freudian oriented medico, but real breast milk again is usually a poor ration. Modern mothers smoke and sometimes drink. Smoking makes the milk very musty. Anyway, a nervous modern mother just can't deliver the right ration. Maybe it's the pace of the times or the breed, but there are few modern Guernsey-type mothers. So even without drinking or smoking, one should forget breast feeding. The foremost reason a baby doesn't do well is poor rations. And to remedy that, here is a formula one can use: 15 ounces of barley water 10 ounces of homogenized milk 3 ounces of corn syrup (As the Romans had honey, 2 ounces of honey may be used instead of corn syrup, if desired. Do not use lactose [a sugar found in milk, used in infant foods] as a substitute.) The amount of syrup should be varied - depending on the baby - some like it weak - some take it stronger. ref: http://members.chello.nl/mgormez/childabuse/barley.html The Romans did not have homogenized milk, so LRH must have used his OT powers to materialize homogenized milk from the future. This glaring bit of out-chronology aside, Katie, who is not a Guernsey Mother with a large and ample bosom that produces a sufficient ration of milk for baby, now has the recipe for baby food straight from Source. Honey can also cause death in babies as they cannot digest it. Never give a child honey until they are two years or older, and even then ask their pediatrician first. Ron's baby food formula is not just a good idea; it is a dire warning not to use hospital formulas or retail baby formulas: Quote:
Modern hospital formulas and patent mixes for babies are not just bad, they are criminal.
Katie is stuck: No breastfeeding, no, no, no. She is not a Geurnsey mom. And hospital formulas and patent mixes are criminal. Katie does not want to commit a crime per LRH or she will be RPF'd. So Katie has to give baby the Roman baby food per LRH. On another note, I must vigorously protest the fact that Tom Cruise does not practice the morality he so loves to preach. He divorced Nicole, his wife of ten years. They have two children and Tom tore the family apart. Why? I thought Scientology had all the answers to making a marriage work. The Scientology Marriage Solutions website claims that Scientology has all of the answers: http://www.marriagesolutions.org/
Quote:How to Improve Your Marriage Course What do you do when a marriage is breaking apart? Is there any way to restore communication, trust and happiness, or is it hopeless? Spiraling divorce rates and the increasing number of single parents show that for many, the only answer was to end it. They lacked the knowledge and technology to improve their marriage. In fact, if you spent as much time on this course as you spend in a week agonizing over your marriage, you wouldn’t have those problems very long. Take this course to restore to your marriage the happiness with which it began. It can be done. Real communication, mutual trust, honesty and openness in the relationship — these are factually attainable with the knowledge and skill you gain on this course. Here you can find the basics of successful marriage and the way to resolve past upsets, increase understanding, and create goals together. You can gain the ability to: # Deal with the rough spots in a marriage # Repair upsets before they blow up # Communicate to solve problems in a marriage # Resolve marital conflicts A happier life with your spouse is within your reach. The course takes approximately 5 mornings, afternoons or evenings, and can be done anytime throughout the week or on weekends.
Tom also divorced Mimi Rogers. That is two divorces for Tom. Statistically, that means his marriage to Katie is doomed to fail. Tom cannot hold together a marriage over time and has in fact failed twice. Where is the OT in that? After he failed to use Scientology teaching to keep his marriage to Nicole together and his family united, Tom next apparently had promiscuous, premarital sex with several actresses and then with Katie Holmes and got her pregnant. Tom and Katie have had promiscuous, premarital sex. Hubbard is hard on such promiscuity:Quote:
"At 1.1 on the tone scale, we enter the area of the most vicious reversal of the second dynamic. Here we have promiscuity, perversion, sadism and irregular practices."Tom, and now Katie, are role models as Scientologists and so they have sent a global message to young people that Scientology approves of promiscuity and premarital sex. Tom Cruise has had both promiscuous and premarital sex, played a violent professional killer in Collateral, and has two divorces under his belt. And yet he has the temerity to attack psychiatry. Tom's ethics are out. He is sending all of the wrong messages out about Scientology. Katie is now technically an unwed mother, another sad statistic of the moral decline of society that CCHR laments in its screeds:
Quote:"Perhaps the most powerful of these enclaves is in the United States, where psychiatry influences many of the institutions that are simply taken for granted: politics, education, health and the court systems. The result of this unfortunate influence can be found by a quick glance around our nation's cities and towns: dramatic increases in illetracy, drug abuse, crime, teenage pregnancy, poverty and insanity. All concurrent with the presence and expansion of they psychiatric influence." [p. 223]
While Katie is not a teenager, she is only 26 and is pregnant by a leading name in Scientology and is unwed. KATIE HOLMES: UNWED PREGNANT SCIENTOLOGIST. WILL TOM BE PUT INTO A LOWER ETHICS CONDITION? OR DOES SCIENTOLOGY APPROVE OF TOM AND KATIE'S PROMISCUITY? If Katie needs painkillers during childbirth, forget it! She has to remain quiet. She also is forbidden to use breathing techniques to help her per Scientology: Quote:
"Kelly Preston will be screaming in silent agony when she gives birth to hubby John Travolta's baby later this month. Her only relief through hours of excruciating labor will be to bite her lips and clench her husband's hand. The staunch Scientologist plans to follow her church's teachings about childbirth - which include a strict no-noise policy in the delivery room and a ban on painkillers. Even natural childbirth breathing techniques are forbidden. "'It's called quiet birth,' says Travolta of the Scientology procedure, which is used because L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology's founder, believed excessive noise can 'be the cause of irrational fears, compulsions and unexplainable behavior' later in a baby's life. 'The birth is for the child and for the mother,' explains John. 'Moans and groans are one thing. It's words that have the most potential. Any people saying negative verbiage could adversely affect the baby later on.' "Everyone in the delivery room--including doctors--are encouraged to keep as quiet as possible. 'The child will experience pain as it's being born, but to have all these people around saying all kinds of things makes it worse. As he grows up and hears these same words, it will stimulate the memory of the pain of birth.'" Katie will not be able to speak to her baby for the first week after it is born because LRH said so. A new baby's brain needs to start wiring itself to higher levels the second it is born, and mother-baby bonding are crucial. But Katie can't talk to her baby and neither can Tom. Hush for a week. What happens if Katie suffers from severe postpartum depression so severe that, God forbid, she is suicidal? Tom Cruise has taken a harsh stand against Brooke Shields. If Katie has suicidal feelings from postpartum depression, she will only be allowed vitamins and exercise. No anti-deppresants in the Cruise household! That would make Tom and Scientology look stupid and so, rather than getting Katie on anti-deppressants and giving her the help she needs, she will be put into the Introspection Rundown if she has postpartum depression. She will be isolated in a room like Lisa Mc Pherson and even Tom will not be allowed to see her. Katie will remain locked up until her CS decides she is better. If Katie gets put into the Introspection Rundown for postpartum depression and Tom has to leave to go make a movie, the Sea Org childcare system is a wonderful place to leave baby. From Jesse Prince:
Just looking at it now, those children were so under-nourished, just not whole, complete children, because L. Ron Hubbard figures barley water is better than milk. . . I've seen those children, 15 to 20 of them in a filthy room, filthy carpet, food everywhere, and playing. If one of them got out of line, they'd just lock them in a room and let them scream itself to death, or scream itself to sleep. . . They make them do what's called rocks and shows, where if they do something that they weren't told to do, they have to do sit-ups, push-ups from the cradle they are punished. From the cradle the children are punished. Quote:
Former Scientologists who served as crew together with Hubbard in the early years remember a five years old deaf and mute child being locked up in the chain-locker. Hubbard said she was not to leave the chain locker until she completed the formula by writing her name. Another witness claims that a three-year-old was once put in the locker. Quote:
"Warrior" describes unhealthy living conditions and neglect of children From: Warrior <firstname.lastname@example.org> Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,alt.religion.christianity Subject: Scientology lied to me over and over for years Date: 23 May 1997 17:38:56 -0700 Message-ID: <email@example.com> In 1975 I joined the Sea Organization of the "Church" of Scientology. That turned out to be the biggest mistake of my life. I didn't realize it at the time of signing my contract, but the Sea Org Recruiter (Steve Grant) from ASHO Day had lied to me about every aspect of the Sea Organization's living conditions. 1) He lied about the facilities for child care (at that time referred to as the Cadet Org). I was told that there was a day care facility to look after my child, and that upon my arrival in ASHO, my child would be placed in this day care center while I worked. Upon my arrival to the Sea Org in LA, I discovered that the Cadet Org (on Melrose Avenue at that time) was absolutely filthy. It was understaffed. Many babies (infants and toddlers) wandered around in the lobby, apparently under the care of the *receptionist*!! I was disgusted. This "day care" facility was obviously in violation of health codes. What I saw was utter neglect, filth and stench. Several babies were crawling on the tiled floor. They were filthy and in need of having their diapers changed. And at the time that I walked into the building and into the lobby, there was *no one* even there to keep their eyes on the children. Sorry to rain on Tom and Katie's good news of a baby on the way, but Tom is a hypocrite and needs to be called on it. Tom has two divorces, broke up his family with Nicole, and was promiscuous and slept around. He had premarital sex with Katie and is sending a message to people everywhere that Scientologists can get as many divorces as they want, be promiscuous, pretend to be violent killers in movies, and engage in generally whatever the hell insane and aberrated conduct they want to, all the while attacking psychiatry. I guess I am missing something here. I thought Scientology was moral, kept marriages and families together, and decried the moral and social decline of drugs, sexual promiscuity, depictions of violence, and illiteracy. When will Scientology hold Tom Cruise accountable for his atrocious and hypocritical behavior? Or is Tom a chosen one who gets to break all of Scientology's rules? Katie, take your baby and get out now! Scientology will want your child to go to a non-school, skip college, and go on staff with Sea Org at sixteen for $20 per week. Katie, is that what you want for your baby? Get out now. It is too late for Tom, but you can save yourself and your baby!
The concern is with infant botulism.
Botulinum spores are found widely in soil, dust, and honey. Adults who swallow botulinum spores are almost never affected. When infants swallow the spores, however, the spores can germinate in their immature gastrointestinal tracts and begin producing botulinum toxin. This has occurred even when the honey was only used to sweeten a pacifier (European Journal of Epidemiology, Nov 1993).
Botulinum toxin is the most poisonous natural substance known to man. The lethal dose is only 1/10,000,000 mg per kg of body weight -- an amount that would be invisible to the naked eye. This tiny amount in the blood stream can cause death within minutes through paralysis of the muscles used in breathing.
Infant botulism has been found on every continent except Africa. In the United States it is most common in the states of California, Utah, and Pennsylvania. While infant botulism can occur from taking in soil or dust (especially vacuum cleaner-bag dust), eating honey is the number one preventable cause. Corn syrups are not sterilized and may also be a source of contamination (The AAP Red Book, 2000).
As you know "members in good standing" can neither read about or post about Scientology on the net.
Although we are practicing Scientology independent of the mother Church (and we are being attacked by the Church for it), Scientology is still our practice and OUR religion.
I encourage every Scientologist in the freezone to take part in defending OUR religion on these hate sites.
I got the picture of you creating and creating with the word "destroy! destroy! destroy!" going through the back of your mind.
What a challenge!
all you Freezoners©™. Why hasn't COS©™ come after you for copyright infringement? Did you really break away from the COS©™ or our you guys just another COS©™ front? Seeing as how the COS©™ hasn't come after you yet for using thier precious religios documents and teaching it without their sanction, I'd guess you're the latter. Either that or now you guys are just making up your own crap and believing in it.
I Just recently discovered these Freezoners. I had actually never herd of them before until they started posting on these boards. FZ's are actually Scientologist that have left the church and have started a separate organization, not sanctioned by COS. They basically believe and practice the same teaching of L. Ron Hubbard. That's why they came here to defend Scientology. They are just as dangerous as the COS.
As far as why the United States gov doing anything about it... I think they may have giving up. Unless they're still secretly investigating them. Which I would almost count on. They probably have special people in the FBI that track them. Scientology is still a very powerful cult in the US and they actually won a law suit against the IRS during the 70s or 80s, I forget which. So they now enjoy a status as an actual religion. Being the secretive cult that they are I would imagine that it'd be hard for the government to make a strong case against the COS. It would take a lot of undercover work and finding good wittiness to testify in court. Plus millions to fight Sceintology lawyers, protect wittiness etc. I think it would make the coolest story if prosecutes and FBI investigator went after Scientology, it would almost be like taking down a big tobacco company, or an oil company . It would be a very tough nut to crack.
Links to this post: